- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal provides relief to Honda India Directs assessing officer to delete addition on account of capitalization of royalty expenses The Delhi bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has come to the rescue of Honda Motorcycle & Scooter India. It has directed the assessing officer (AO) to delete the addition on account of capitalization of royalty expenses...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal provides relief to Honda India
Directs assessing officer to delete addition on account of capitalization of royalty expenses
The Delhi bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has come to the rescue of Honda Motorcycle & Scooter India. It has directed the assessing officer (AO) to delete the addition on account of capitalization of royalty expenses by holding it to be revenue in nature.
The assesse is a subsidiary of Honda Motor Company Limited, Japan, engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of motorcycles and scooters. It entered into international transactions with its associated enterprise and therefore reference was made to the transfer-pricing officer to determine the arm's-length price in respect to the international transactions.
The assesse raised the issue of capitalization of the royalty expenses paid to him in lieu of granting the license under the royalty and technical know-how agreement. The assesse claimed it did not acquire any new asset or benefit from the payment made under the agreement.
The Coram of judicial member Amit Shukla and accountant member Prashant Maharishi noted that the assesse was already engaged in the manufacturing of motorcycles and scooters and the payment of royalty expenses was not with respect to the setting up of a manufacturing facility.
ITAT found that the issue was squarely covered in favour of the assesse by the decision of the coordinate bench. It, therefore, directed the AO to delete the addition of capitalization of royalty expenses holding it to be revenue in nature.