- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Nilima Pathak
![Nilima Pathak Nilima Pathak](/images/authorplaceholder.jpg?type=1&v=2)
From Nilima Pathak
Government clears appointment of Manjusha Ajay Deshpande as Bombay High Court Additional Judge
The Minister of State for Law and Justice Arjun Meghwal apprised about it via Twitter
Supreme Court sets aside NCDRC order; chides it for acting as experts
Allows insurance claim to the cold storage business operator
Delhi High Court: Depreciation Allowable on Goodwill Without Paying Cash For Acquisition
According to the Court, goodwill being a non-tangible asset, is eligible for depreciation under Section 32(1) of the Income
Calcutta High Court orders Ministry of Finance to probe ‘shocking’ collusion of Railways in Rs. 4,000 crores settlement case
The Calcutta High Court has ordered the Ministry of Finance to set up a committee to inquire into the apparently shocking
Delhi High Court Restrains Wow! Momo from using 'Wow! China Bistro' in Trademark Infringement Case
The Delhi High Court has restrained the fast-food chain Wow! Momo from using the trademark ‘Wow! China Bistro’ after China
Delhi High Court orders Central Government to block 22 rogue websites streaming cricket matches illegally
The Delhi High Court has directed the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology and the Department of Technology
Karnataka High Court: Public Banks cannot Act as Private Lender
The Karnataka High Court has granted relief to Legends Property, a Bengaluru-based partnership construction company. It held
Gujarat High Court orders GST department to refund inadvertently paid IGST alongwith interest
The Gujarat High Court has directed the refund of the Integrated Goods and Service Tax amount, along with applicable interest
Bombay High Court: Customs Authorities Cannot Seal Premises under Section 105
The Bombay High Court has held that customs authorities do not possess the explicit power to seal premises under Section 105
Madras High Court asks trial courts not to insist on certified copies of judgments
The Madras High Court has stated that trial courts should not insist on certified copies of the orders and judgments of
Supreme Court: Concurrent sentencing will merit only if conviction arises out of single transaction
The Supreme Court has observed that only when the conviction in a cheque case arises out of a single transaction, a concurrent
Supreme Court: NCLAT can recall its Judgments
The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with a National Company Law Appellate Tribunal order holding that recalling