Emphasizes there’s no legal compulsion and the person may have reservations about not providing such details
Sets aside the order of the high court and restores the trial court order
States it is contrary to Section 34(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Notes that the respondent raised certain technicalities merely to delay the execution of the award
As per the report of the local commissioner, the company garnered a profit of Rs.18-19 lakh from selling fakes
States that it was a pure business expense, hence, deductions were allowable under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act.
The appellant had appealed seeking directions to the respondent to lift the order relating to his State Bank of India account
An appeal was filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, challenging an order passed by the Company Law Board
Rules that on receiving the entire outstanding loan amount from the borrowers, the bank had no claim over the auction money
States that the intent of the Parliament in introducing the Goods and Services Tax Act was to avoid a multiplicity of levies
The petitioners had complained of facing huge losses to their businesses after their accounts were suspended
The bench cites the decision of the Supreme Court in a previous case
