- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
The names of judicial officers have been cleared by the Central Government for appointment as judges of the Rajasthan High Court.Following a SC Collegium resolution passed earlier this month, the elevation of Abhay Chaturvedi and Narendra Singh Dhaddha to the High Court Bench has been endorsed by the Government.The notification read, “In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (1)...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
The names of judicial officers have been cleared by the Central Government for appointment as judges of the Rajasthan High Court.
Following a SC Collegium resolution passed earlier this month, the elevation of Abhay Chaturvedi and Narendra Singh Dhaddha to the High Court Bench has been endorsed by the Government.
The notification read, “In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (1) of Article 216 of the Constitution of India, the President is pleased to appoint S/Shri (1) Abhay Chaturvedi and (2) Narendra Singh Dhaddha, to be Judges of the Rajasthan High Court, in that order of seniority, with effect from the date they assume charge of their respective offices.”
The working strength of the Rajasthan High Court has risen to 25 judges against a sanctioned strength of 40 judges.
The High Court Collegium proposed a total eleven names for elevation to the High Court in May 2018. However, the Supreme Court Collegium had decided to defer the consideration of the remaining nine names for the present.