- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Securities & Exchange Board Of India Reiterates That It Is Empowered To Act Against Auditors Which Do A Poor Job
[ By Bobby Anthony ]The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has reiterated that it has powers to take action against audit firms which act in a manner that is detrimental to the interests of public shareholders.SEBI Chairman Ajay Tyagi stated that if companies which audit listed entities do not do their job well, then they should not be allowed to audit listed companies, at a...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has reiterated that it has powers to take action against audit firms which act in a manner that is detrimental to the interests of public shareholders.
SEBI Chairman Ajay Tyagi stated that if companies which audit listed entities do not do their job well, then they should not be allowed to audit listed companies, at a function organized by the Association of Investment Bankers of India (AIBI), the umbrella body of merchant bankers.
“Our position is very simple. If they are auditing listed companies based on which investors are investing and if we find that that work has not been done properly and in investors’ interest, then audit firms should not be allowed to audit listed companies for some time,” Tyagi stated.
“It is our parliamentary mandate, I would say, to see that it is done and there is no trouble there. It goes to the basic issue of investor protection being the parliamentary mandate of SEBI,” he said.
However, he clarified that the SEBI is not the regulatory body which registers auditors and the capital markets regulator is not eyeing any such authority.
“It’s not our case that SEBI is the agency which registers or regulates the auditors. We are not de-registering auditors. We don’t have the authority and we don’t wish to have that authority,” he said.
Interestingly, the SEBI chief’s statements came close on the heels of the Supreme Court set aside an order by the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) which had ruled that the SEBI does not that have the authority to bar auditors, while hearing an appeal filed by Price Waterhouse (PW).
It may be recalled that in January 2018, the SEBI had barred PW from auditing listed entities for two years for its alleged role in the Satyam Computers matter.