- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
SEBI Unveils New Disclosure Guidelines for Material Events
SEBI Unveils New Disclosure Guidelines for Material Events
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) in order to bring more transparency and to ensure timely disclosure of material events / information by listed entities, came out with a ‘stricter timeline’ for disclosure of material events or information by listed companies and introduced criteria for determining the materiality of events.
The circular will become effective from 15 July.
As per the circular, the market regulator has directed listed companies to disclose family settlement agreements, which can impact the management and control of such firms to stock exchanges. These agreements need to be disclosed within 12 hours in case a listed entity is a party and within 24 hours where the listed entity is not a party.
In addition, for material events or information which emanate from the listed entity, including those related to acquisitions, Scheme of Arrangement, consolidation of shares, and buyback of securities, the timeline for disclosure by the entity has been reduced from 24 hours to 12 hours.
In the event, the information which stems from a decision taken in a meeting of the board of directors, the disclosure needs to be made within 30 minutes from the closure of such meeting.
Apart from the above, the timelines have been fixed 24 hours from the occurrence of the event in case the information is not emanating from within the listed entity.
A revision in rating has been included for fraud or defaults by a listed entity, its promoter, directors; restructuring in relation to loans from banks, one time settlement with a bank and winding-up petition filed by any party / creditors.
Apropos to the criteria for determining the materiality of events, SEBI laid one of the criteria is the omission of an event, whose value or the expected impact in terms of value, exceeds the lower of 2 per cent of turnover, or 2 per cent of net worth as per the last audited consolidated financial statements or 5 per cent of the average of absolute value of profit or loss after tax, as per the last three audited consolidated financial statements of the listed entity.
The market watchdog elucidated that average of absolute value of profit or loss is required to be considered by disregarding the ‘sign’ (positive or negative) that denotes such value as the said value is required only for determining the threshold for materiality of the event and not for any commercial consideration.
In case a listed entity does not have a track record of three years of financials, like in case of a demerged entity, the average may be taken for the number of years as may be available.
SEBI also issued guidelines on when information could be said to have occurred for disclosures under the SEBI (Listing of Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulation (LODR, Regulation).
SEBI noted that in certain instances, the disclosure would depend upon the stage of discussion, negotiation or approval and in other instances where there is no such discussion, negotiation or approval required –in case of natural calamities, disruptions etc.
Considering the price sensitivity involved, for events such as decision on declaration of dividends, SEBI said that disclosure would be made on receipt of approval of the event by the board of Directors, pending shareholder’s approval.
In case in-principle approval or approval to explore (which is not final approval) is given by the Board of Directors, the same shall not require disclosure under Regulation 30 of the LODR Regulations, SEBI mentioned in its circular.