- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
SC judges likely to hear cases from court next week through video conference
The Supreme Court has stated on May 12 that as part of a pilot project, the Judges are likely to come to the courtrooms in the court complex from next week to take up matters through video conferencing.Since March 25, the Supreme Court has been taking up matters through video conferencing following the nationwide lockdown due to the spread of coronavirus. The Apex Court had suspended the entry...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
The Supreme Court has stated on May 12 that as part of a pilot project, the Judges are likely to come to the courtrooms in the court complex from next week to take up matters through video conferencing.
Since March 25, the Supreme Court has been taking up matters through video conferencing following the nationwide lockdown due to the spread of coronavirus. The Apex Court had suspended the entry of advocates and other staff members in the high security zone. The benches, during the lockdown, are usually assembled at the residences of the judges. The lawyers were asked to join the court proceedings either from their residence or offices.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta enquired from a bench, comprising Justices L. Nageswara Rao, S Abdul Nazeer and Sanjiv Khanna, whether the Judges were holding the proceedings from the Supreme Court premises. The bench replied that it was a pilot project and added that from the beginning of the next week, there is high probability that judges may come to the courtrooms to conduct hearing through video conferencing. Mehta told the Court that this appears to be a good idea. During the third phase of the lockdown, the Court also decided to constitute a single-judge bench beginning May 13, to take up matters connected with appeals of bail and anticipatory bail, where offences entail jail term of up to seven years, along with transfer matters. This has been seen as a step to address pendency in the Top Court.