- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- AI
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- ESG
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- AI
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- ESG
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Gaming
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- In Focus
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- IP & Tech Era
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Student Corner
- Take On Board
- Tax
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Viewpoint
- Zoom In
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
NCLT Postpones CCI’s Case Against WhatsApp Citing Impending DPDP Rules

NCLT Postpones CCI’s Case Against WhatsApp Citing Impending DPDP Rules
Intends to examine the overlap between the competition regulator’s jurisdiction and the forthcoming norms
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has postponed the hearing on the Competition Commission of India’s (CCI) case against WhatsApp’s 2021 Privacy Policy due to the upcoming Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Rules.
The bench will examine the overlap between the CCI’s jurisdiction and the forthcoming data protection rules.
In January 2025, the tribunal stayed the CCI order barring WhatsApp from transferring user data to Meta for five years. It imposed Rs.213 crore, noting that the ban could lead to the collapse of the business model followed by WhatsApp LLC.
Meta submitted that the remedies for privacy and data protection were without the jurisdiction and expertise of the CCI. It argued, "The Commission is not an appropriate authority to impose privacy and data protection requirements.”
CCI cited Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, maintaining that it was within its jurisdiction to pass appropriate orders and impose the penalty.
The CCI stated, "WhatsApp is a dominant entity, which abused its dominance. This was proved after all relevant evidence.”
Meanwhile, Dinesh Jotwani, Co-Managing Partner, Jotwani Associates, pointed out that the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MEITY), Government of India, could declare the DPDP rules at any time.