- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
NCLAT Allows Lenders To Vote Against NBCC’s Bid To Acquire Jaypee Infratech Ltd; Directs Completion Of Voting Process
[ By Bobby Anthony ]Lenders to the Government of India owned NBCC (India) Limited, have been allowed to vote against its proposal to acquire debt-ridden Jaypee Infratech Limited, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has stated.The NCLAT was hearing a batch of applications filed by banks seeking permission to vote against the NBCC proposal.Earlier, a consortium of lenders...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
Lenders to the Government of India owned NBCC (India) Limited, have been allowed to vote against its proposal to acquire debt-ridden Jaypee Infratech Limited, the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has stated.
The NCLAT was hearing a batch of applications filed by banks seeking permission to vote against the NBCC proposal.
Earlier, a consortium of lenders (Committee of Creditors) led by IDBI Bank, had sought NCLAT’s permission to vote against NBCC’s bid to acquire Jaypee Infratech Ltd.
Incidentally, the voting process began on May 31 and ended on June 10. As many as 13 banks and 23,000 homebuyers have voting rights.
The NCLAT clarified that while declaring the results, votes of absentees would not be counted in the total voting percentage.
IDBI Bank, which is part of the consortium of lenders (creditors), has been against NBCC's resolution plan on the grounds of its bid being conditional.
The NBCC's bid seeks the cancellation of an estimated income tax liability of Rs 33,000 crore due over a period of 30 years under the concession agreement for the transfer of land from the Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority to Jaypee Infratech Limited.
The NBCC had also sought relief from taking consent of the YEIDA for any business transfer between Jaypee Infratech Limited and the Yamuna Expressway special purpose vehicle for transfer of assets as well as land parcels from Jaypee Infratech Limited to the land bank (special purpose vehicle).
The Committee of Creditors (lenders) had asked the NBCC to clarify about conditions and also sought their removal from the plan.
However, the NBCC made some minor changes to its bid, including reducing the quantity of unsold inventory it plans to give to the lenders, but did not do away with the contentious clauses related to income tax liability as well as taking approval of Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority for any business transfer between Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority and Jaypee Infratech Limited.
Following this, although the lenders put the bid to vote, IDBI Bank had approached the NCLAT seeking permission to reject the bid.