- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Makers of Netflix show ‘Hasmukh’ slapped with legal notice over defamatory content against the legal profession
A legal notice has been sent to the makers of a Netflix web series ‘Hasmukh’ for the false portrayal and disparaging comments against lawyers and the related defamatory content in the show. The notice terms that the scandalous statements made in the show are a deliberate and intentional attack to malign the image of the legal profession.Advocates Abhishek Bharadwaj and Hardik Vashisth...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
A legal notice has been sent to the makers of a Netflix web series ‘Hasmukh’ for the false portrayal and disparaging comments against lawyers and the related defamatory content in the show. The notice terms that the scandalous statements made in the show are a deliberate and intentional attack to malign the image of the legal profession.
Advocates Abhishek Bharadwaj and Hardik Vashisth have sent legal notice to Netflix against the streaming of the show.
Further, the legal notice seeks the makers of the show to remove the defamatory and malicious content and tender an unconditional apology, failing which legal action could be initiated against them.
An immediate and unconditional apology has been demanded and also the proprietors of the Netflix show have been asked to remove the derogatory content. The notice also demands that the makers cease and desist from maligning lawyers in any manner conceivable.
One of the episodes allegedly depicts lawyers in bad light terming lawyers as “thieves”, “scoundrels”, “goons” and “rapists”. According to the legal notice, use of such malicious terms bring disrepute to the legal fraternity and impugn the image of lawyers. Further the show portrays the legal profession in a bad light in the guise of comedy.
The notice states that the derogatory comments would have far reaching implications and that the content tends to malign the image of the legal profession and tarnish the images of lawyers in the eyes of the subscribers and therefore Netflix has been called upon to remove the content with immediate effect.