- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Madras HC: Approach Dispute Resolution Panel Over 2017 Tax Dispute
[ By Titus Manickam Rock ]Writ petitions filed over tax disputes relating to buy-back of shares by Cognizant Technology Solutions India Private Limited (Cognizant) and two of its foreign shareholders, viz. Cognizant (Mauritius) Limited and New Jersey-based Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, were dismissed by the Madras High Court Justice K. Kalyanasundaram on grounds...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
Writ petitions filed over tax disputes relating to buy-back of shares by Cognizant Technology Solutions India Private Limited (Cognizant) and two of its foreign shareholders, viz. Cognizant (Mauritius) Limited and New Jersey-based Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, were dismissed by the Madras High Court Justice K. Kalyanasundaram on grounds of maintainability.
The two shareholders, viz. Cognizant Mauritius and Jersey-based Cognizant contended that the draft assessment order involved a violation of the principles of natural justice. On their part, the IT department countered that the petitioners devised dubious transaction to pay exorbitant amounts for the shares to avoid paying Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) and Buyback Distribution Tax (BBDT).
Without going into the merits of the case, the Court noted the Income Tax Act provided for a Dispute Resolution Panel consisting of experts in the field and dismissed the writ petitions directing them to approach the Dispute Resolution Panel within two weeks.
Cognizant was also directed to approach the Appellate Authority with regard to another IT order directing Cognizant to pay tax at 15% of the total payment amounting to Rs.19,415 crore along with interest under Section 115P of the IT Act.
Senior Advocates Gopal Subramaniam and Srinath Sridevan appeared for Cognizant and its shareholders. Additional Solicitor General G. Rajagopalan and Karthik Ranganathan Senior Standing Counsel, appeared for the IT Department.