- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
ITAT upholds denial of tax exemption on failing to file electronic form
ITAT upholds denial of tax exemption on failing to file electronic form
The revenue department submitted that Form 10B was filed by the assessee manually during the appellate proceedings
The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld the denial of exemption claimed under Sections 11 and 12 of the Income Tax Act for failure to file Form 10B electronically.
The appellant, Ambica Sarvajnik Trust Anklav is a public charitable trust. During scrutiny assessment, the CPC denied the trust deduction claimed under the IT Act, alleging that Form No.10B was not filed electronically. It demanded a tax of Rs.7,73,720 and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dismissed the appeal.
Aggrieved by the order, the appellant filed an appeal before ITAT.
The appellant submitted that the benefit of exemption under Sections 11 and 12 would be available to the assessee in respect of the income derived from the property held under the trust for earlier assessment years. There was no change in either object or the activities for the Assessment Year 2016-2017 compared to the Assessment Year 2018-19.
But the revenue department submitted that Form 10B was filed manually during the appellate proceedings and no evidence of filing the same electronically was adduced by the appellant.
The Coram of T.R. Senthil Kumar (judicial member) and Waseem Ahmed (accountant member) observed that the assessee was free to file Form 10B online and/or approach the CIT(Exemption) after filing the form electronically. This was to condone the delay in accordance with the delegated powers vested under the IT Act. The bench maintained that such a power was not vested with the CIT(A).
The tribunal held, "We do not find any infirmity in the order passed by the CIT(A) and therefore, have no hesitation in confirming the order."