- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
ITAT rules on provisions of TDS under the Income Tax Act
ITAT rules on provisions of TDS under the Income Tax Act
It directs the authorities not to take any coercive action until the hearing of the appeal
The Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the provisions of the Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) under the Income Tax Act, 1961 is not applicable to the reinsurance commission.
While concluding the assessment proceedings, the assessing officer (AO) had made a disallowance under the IT Act due to alleged non-compliance with the provisions. The assessee claimed that the provision was not applicable to the reinsurance commission.
The bench comprising President GS Pannu and Judicial Member Saktijit Dey observed that the issue in dispute appeared to be in favor of the assessee by a number of judicial precedents.
ITAT ruled, "We are inclined to grant expeditious hearing of the corresponding appeal of the assessee. The Registry is directed to fix the appeal for hearing on 28 April 2022. Paper-books, if any, shall be filed by the parties sufficiently ahead of the date of hearing of the appeal in accordance with the extant rules. Since the date of hearing of the appeal is announced in the open court in presence of both the parties, issuance of separate notice for hearing to the parties is dispensed with."
"As regards the impugned demand, the AO may pursue the assessee for paying a part of the demand. However, no coercive action shall be taken by the AO for the recovery of the demand till the date of hearing of the appeal. In case of any unnecessary adjournment being sought by the assessee, the interim protection granted to the assessee will be vacated and the assessee will also lose the benefit of early hearing of appeal," the tribunal added.