- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Intellectual Property and the impact of Brexit: Part I The Brexit transition period ended on 31 December 2020 marking United Kingdom (UK) way out from the European Union. The effects will be determined by the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement signed and ratified by the UK parliament in 2020 itself. The piece will discuss the effect it will have on the IP. For the Patent rights, there...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
Intellectual Property and the impact of Brexit: Part I
The Brexit transition period ended on 31 December 2020 marking United Kingdom (UK) way out from the European Union. The effects will be determined by the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement signed and ratified by the UK parliament in 2020 itself. The piece will discuss the effect it will have on the IP.
For the Patent rights, there no action will be taken whereby the current system of the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) and the European Patent Office remains unchanged. Marking its way out from the EU, it will have certain changes on trademark and design rights from 1 January 2021. The existing rights in the EU and the protection it provides will no longer be extended to the UK.
All existing protections such as EU Trademarks (EUTM), Registered Community Designs (RCDs), Unregistered Community Designs (UCDs), and all such protection which designates the EU will not entail protection in the UK. Nevertheless, the provision relating to IP rights, mentioned in the Withdrawal Agreement will ensure protection beyond the transition period.
The EUTM no longer covering the UK will now have an equivalent comparable trademark in the UK. The existing EUTM and RCD in the EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) database will now be cloned by the UKIPO to create these comparable rights. Any such use of the mark in the UK after the transition period ends will not be taken into account by the EU. These new rights will
• Be assigned a new unique registration number but not issued a new registration certificate;
• Be recorded on the UK register and retain the filing dates recorded against the corresponding EU right;
• Be fully independent UK trademarks and designs which can be enforced, challenged, licensed, or renewed completely separately from the remaining EU right;
• Require an address for service.
• The process of creating UK comparable rights is free of charge and owners of EUTMs, RCDs, and international trademark and design registrations covering the EU will not have to take any action.
In case, there is any pending trademark and design application at the EUIPO and the applicant needs to get it secured in UK, they need to be re-filed with the UKIPO for pursuing UK protection and requiring a UK address for service. For securing the same filing date of the EU application, the applicant has nine months from the transition period to file in the UKIPO.
On similar lines, the holder of RCD will also have nine months after the end of the transition period to re-file the application in the UK with a UK address for service to maintain the earlier filing and priority dates of the corresponding EU right. If the RCD has been deferred on 31 December 2020, they will be treated as pending application design. For the UCD rights, this will immediately and automatically be replaced by the UK continuing unregistered design rights.