- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
[ By Bobby Anthony ]The Mumbai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has directed suspended directors of Cox & Kings as well as its earlier auditors to give the details sought by its resolution professional (RP) or else face an arrest warrant.The company’s resolution professional had informed the NCLT that he is unable to proceed with the corporate insolvency resolution...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
The Mumbai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has directed suspended directors of Cox & Kings as well as its earlier auditors to give the details sought by its resolution professional (RP) or else face an arrest warrant.
The company’s resolution professional had informed the NCLT that he is unable to proceed with the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) due to the absence of relevant documents and that the NCLT has to direct the suspended board to furnish these documents.
The NCLT has directed the company’s former directors to all relevant documents sought by the resolution professional within two days or face arrest.
The NCLT has set February 20 as the next date for hearing.
It may be recalled that in October 2019, the NCLT had admitted a plea filed by Rattan India Finance to initiate insolvency proceedings against Cox &Kings for defaulting on a loan repayment.
In June 2019, it had informed the stock exchanges that it had not paid Rs 150 crore out of Rs 200 crore worth of loans given by two investors. Then in September it said it had defaulted on a loan of Rs 30 crore.