- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
CBDT asked by Delhi HC to consider if interest on compensation by Motor Accident Claim Tribunal is non-taxable
The Central Board of Direct Taxation (CBDT) has been directed by the Delhi High Court to consider if the interest accrued upon compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (MACT) can be declared non-taxable.A petition seeking to quash Section 194 A (3) (ix) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was being heard by a Division Bench of Justices S Muralidhar and IS Mehta.. Deduction of tax...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
The Central Board of Direct Taxation (CBDT) has been directed by the Delhi High Court to consider if the interest accrued upon compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (MACT) can be declared non-taxable.
A petition seeking to quash Section 194 A (3) (ix) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was being heard by a Division Bench of Justices S Muralidhar and IS Mehta.. Deduction of tax on interest accrued upon the award granted by the MACT is mandated by the Section.
The CBDT has been directed by the Court to consider the plea as a representation and decide on the same before June 30.
Advocate Amit Sahni filed the petition stating that the Section is unconstitutional and in direct conflict with the object and spirit of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, a social welfare legislation.
The petition argued that as compensation receipts are not taxable under the Income Tax Act, interest under Motor Accident claims should not be made taxable.
The Court has asked the CBDT to also consider a former representation dated December 14, 2018.