- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Bank of India approaches NCLT to initiate insolvency proceedings against Future Retail
Bank of India approaches NCLT to initiate insolvency proceedings against Future Retail
A consortium of creditors raised concerns about the recovery of dues after Reliance Indu stries took over 200 stores of the Kishore Biyani-owned company
The Bank of India has approached the Mumbai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) against Future Retail Limited for the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).
The Coram of Judicial Member Justice PN Deshmukh and Technical Member SB Vohra issued a notice to Future Retail on an application by the bank under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). It allowed the company to furnish its response.
Filed through advocate Palash Agarwal, the application alleged that Future Retail had committed a default of Rs.3,495 crores through a one-time restructuring scheme between the bank and the company.
Appearing for the bank, Senior Advocate Ravi Kadam requested the bench that since vacations were approaching, the tribunal should grant at least one more hearing. Acceding to the request, the matter has been posted for May 12 for further hearing.
Recently, in a filing with the Bombay Stock Exchange, the Future Group stated that 69 percent of the creditors had voted against the composite scheme of the arrangement with the Reliance Group entities. It claimed that only 30 percent of creditors voted in favor of the arrangement.