- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Allen & Overy, O'Melveny & Myers merger talks exposes chinks in the competition’s armor
Much interest has been generated in the merger talks between Allen & Overy and O’Melveny & Myers. So much so that one top partner at a US firm in London said, “Allen Myers sounds like a 1970s porn star.”For an entire generation, this potential trans-Atlantic merger holds immense significance as it is likely to set the tone for the future of all top UK firms.A Twitter poll by Legal Week...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
Much interest has been generated in the merger talks between Allen & Overy and O’Melveny & Myers. So much so that one top partner at a US firm in London said, “Allen Myers sounds like a 1970s porn star.”
For an entire generation, this potential trans-Atlantic merger holds immense significance as it is likely to set the tone for the future of all top UK firms.
A Twitter poll by Legal Week saw readers reluctant to let go of the A&O brand with the most popular merged identity names being Allen Myers and Allen & O’Melveny. If at all the deal goes through, the likes of Linklaters and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer Will be unable to keep a straight face while talking about building their New York presence. The deal would put immense pressure on rivals, even the likes of Latham & Watkins and Kirkland & Ellis. But in the event the deal fails, the implications would be even bigger.
For one, if A&O is unable to secure a deal with a mid-tier US firm like O’Melveny, it will put all decent deals out of reach.
A&O rivals in the UK are watching closely and beneath it all there is a desire that the deal goes through, however grudgingly.