- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Advance ruling obtained by assessee declared void ab initio for suppressing material facts: AAR Telengana
Advance ruling obtained by assessee declared void ab initio for suppressing material facts: AAR Telengana
Observes that the questions were pending before the Directorate General of Goods & Services Tax, Intelligence
The Telangana Bench of the Authority for Advance Rulings (AAR) has ruled that Srico Projects Pvt Ltd (applicant), who obtained an advance ruling, had suppressed material facts. Therefore the ruling was void ab initio under Section 104 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act/Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act/TGST Act).
The two-member bench comprising SV Kasi Visweswara Rao (State Tax) and Sahil Inamdar (Central Tax) stated that as per Section 98(2) of the CGST/TGST Act, the AAR could not admit an application if the question raised was already pending or decided in any proceedings related to the applicant.
The bench observed that the questions were pending in a proceeding before the Directorate General of Goods & Services Tax, Intelligence, Hyderabad zonal unit.
Thus, AAR held, “The order issued in the 5th reference is declared as void ab initio as per Section 104(1) of CGST/TGST Act and thereupon all the provisions of CGST/TGST Act or the rules made thereunder, shall apply to the applicant as if such advance ruling had never been made.”