- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
US Antitrust Trial Set for September: Google's Digital Ad Practices Under Scrutiny
US Antitrust Trial Set for September: Google's Digital Ad Practices Under Scrutiny
On Monday, a US federal judge scheduled a jury trial to commence on September 9, 2024, in a lawsuit filed by the US Justice Department and a coalition of states against Google. The lawsuit alleges that Google unlawfully monopolised the digital advertising sector by abusing its dominance in digital advertising technology.
The lawsuit, initiated in January 2023, alleges that Google has monopolised the digital advertising market and hindered competition. The government contends that Google should be compelled to divest its ad manager suite.
Google refutes the allegations, asserting that a successful lawsuit would impede innovation, increase advertising costs, and create challenges for numerous small businesses and publishers seeking growth.
The Justice Department, along with Virginia and other states had sought a July date for the trial in Alexandria, Virginia. However, US District Judge Leonie Brinkema explained in an order that a summer trial would have presented logistical challenges.
Google is also scheduled to face a trial in March 2025 in a US federal court in Texas. In this case, a lawsuit filed by Texas and other states alleges that Google’s ad tech practices violate antitrust laws.
In another legal proceeding, a US judge in Washington, D.C., is anticipated to consider closing arguments in May for lawsuits filed by the US Justice Department, Colorado, and other states regarding Google’s web search dominance.