- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Publishers Sue Google Over Ads For Pirated E-Books
Google faces a lawsuit filed by educational publishers Cengage, Macmillan Learning, McGraw Hill, and Elsevier. The publishers allege that Google is complicit in promoting pirate copies of their textbooks through its search engine.
The lawsuit, submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, accuses Google of disregarding thousands of copyright infringement notices and profiting from the sale of pirated digital textbooks. According to the publishers, Google’s search results prominently feature heavily discounted pirated versions of textbooks, overshadowing legitimate options.
Matt Oppenheim, the publishers' attorney from Oppenheim + Zebrak, criticized Google, calling it a "thieves' den" for textbook pirates. The complaint asserts that pirated e-books appear at the top of search results due to their artificially low prices, while legitimate, licensed e-books are pushed down.
The lawsuit claims that Google's actions have exacerbated the issue by restricting ads for legitimate e-books, thereby disrupting the textbook market. The publishers allege that Google’s online advertising platform promotes pirated e-books while rejecting ads from authorized sellers.
"As a result, the textbook market is upside down, as the world's largest online advertising business advertises ebooks for pirates but rejects ebook ads for legitimate sellers," the lawsuit said.
The publishers have been raising concerns with Google about these issues since 2021, but allege that their complaints have been ignored. The lawsuit seeks monetary damages for copyright and trademark infringement as well as deceptive trade practices.