- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Multiply Files Suit In US District Court Of California Against X For Violating Trademark Rights
Multiply Files Suit In US District Court Of California Against X For Violating Trademark Rights
Elon Musk had rebranded Twitter last year
A lawsuit has been filed in the US District Court of California against Elon Musk's social-media platform X (formerly Twitter) for violating the trademark rights of the PR firm Multiply.
The complaint said that X causes consumer confusion by using the trademark for social-media marketing services that compete with Multiply.
The spokesperson for Multiply expressed that Musk "shamelessly stole the established identity of our social media and PR agency. We had no choice but to defend our mark and fight X in court."
Last year, Musk rebranded Twitter as X after buying the platform. Hundreds of other companies own ‘X’ and Musk's X is already facing a separate infringement from marketing firm X SocialMedia.
Meanwhile, Virginia-based Multiply has created social-media ad campaigns for drink brands including Arizona, Corona and Liquid Death. It adopted ‘X’ branding in 2019 and owns a federal trademark covering its logo.
The complaint said that the Twitter rebrand confused existing and prospective clients of Multiply, many of which overlap with X Corp. Multiply requested the court to force X Corp to stop using the ‘X’ trademark and to award an unspecified number of monetary damages.
Keith Wesley and John Harabedian of Ellis George appeared for Multiply