- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
London High Court To Decide On Trademark Rights Battle Between Adidas And Thom Browne
London High Court To Decide On Trademark Rights Battle Between Adidas And Thom Browne
The trial is expected to conclude soon
The London High Court is hearing the latest round of a global dispute between athletic wear giant Adidas and fashion house Thom Browne. The two entities have resumed their legal battle focused on their competing striped trademarks.
In 2021, New York designer Browne, who regularly uses a four-bar stripe pattern, sued Adidas to revoke several trademarks featuring Adidas' iconic three-stripe motif.
Browne, which changed from a three-bar pattern in 2007 after Adidas complained, argued that Adidas was trying to establish a monopoly on the use of stripes on garments.
However, Adidas countersued Browne for allegedly infringing its trademarks by selling leisure and sportswear featuring four stripes, accusing Browne of exploiting its reputation and brand image.
Last year, the companies had a face-off in the US, where a jury rejected Adidas' trademark lawsuit. Later, the decision was upheld on appeal.
Meanwhile, Browne intends to bring a separate trademark litigation against Adidas in the Netherlands and at the European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Thom Browne's lawyer Philip Roberts said that Adidas used certain trademarks as ‘Trojan horses’ to prevent the use of stripes on other companies' products.
He added, “The breadth of Adidas' asserted monopoly, which threatens the basic freedom of fashion designers to design clothing in the manner they wish.”
At this, Charlotte May, the Adidas' lawyer expressed that Browne's 2020 launch of a sportswear range was a tipping point that "strikes at the heart of the Adidas business.”
She pointed to a collaboration with NBA star LeBron James and a partnership with Spanish soccer team FC Barcelona, when Adidas-sponsored player Lionel Messi was at the club, as evidence that "Browne intended to continue their encroachment into sportswear and sports marketing.”