- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Supreme Court in Unitech Case: Issues Notice on ED’s Plea Challenging Bail Granted by Delhi High Court to Preeti Chandra
Supreme Court in Unitech Case: Issues Notice on ED’s Plea Challenging Bail Granted by Delhi High Court to Preeti Chandra
The Supreme Court issued notice in the plea filed by the Directorate of Enforcement assailing the order of the Delhi High Court whereby bail was granted to Preeti Chandra, the wife of Unitech promoter Sanjay Chandra, in a money laundering case.
The vacation bench comprising of Justices Hima Kohli and Rajesh Bindal were apprised by the Additional Solicitor General Sanjay Jain, appearing for the ED that the High Court had kept the bail order passed on 14th June, 2023 in abeyance till Friday (16th June, 2023) as it was informed that ED would file an appeal before the Apex Court.
Subsequently, the bench issued notice in the plea, essentially, seeking cancellation of the bail order, and stayed the operation of the impugned order till further orders of the Apex Court.
Chandra was asked to file her response within a period of two weeks and thereafter the ED was asked to file its rejoinder within two weeks. The matter was directed to be listed after 4 weeks.
The Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Chandra informed the Court regarding the health condition, which prompted the Court to grant her the liberty to apply for temporary bail before the competent Court, which, it directed, would be considered in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the pendency of the present case.
Chandra was denied bail by the trial court in November last year taking note of the ‘enormity of the transactions and seriousness of the allegations.’
The money laundering case was filed after FIRs were filed by Delhi Police and Central Bureau of Investigation on the basis of complaints from homebuyers against the Unitech Group and its promoters.
In the year 2021, the ED had filed a PMLA case against Unitech Group and its promoters over allegations that the owners namely Sanjay and Ajay Chandra had illegally diverted more than Rs. 2,000 crores to Cyprus and the Cayman Islands. Chargesheet has been filed in the case by the ED.
The agency alleged that the funds collected from homebuyers for housing projects were not utilized for the intended purpose and the accused persons committed money laundering.
The ED also alleged that Preeti Chandra received proceeds of crime amounting to Rs. 107 crores in her company ‘Prakausli Investments Private Limited’ but had not disclosed the ultimate usage of the amount in question.