- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Judiciary's mission is to administer justice to the common man: Justice D Y Chandrachud
Judiciary's mission is to administer justice to the common man: Justice D Y Chandrachud The quest for fairness unites judges and lawyers Supreme Court judge Justice DY Chandrachud has said that in a court of law there might be one universal truth, but the paths to it can be many. He was speaking at the inaugural function of the new annex building of the Bombay High Court's...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
Judiciary's mission is to administer justice to the common man: Justice D Y Chandrachud
The quest for fairness unites judges and lawyers
Supreme Court judge Justice DY Chandrachud has said that in a court of law there might be one universal truth, but the paths to it can be many. He was speaking at the inaugural function of the new annex building of the Bombay High Court's Aurangabad Bench.
He said that in the quest for justice, both judges and lawyers have one common mission, which is to administer justice to the common man.
"We are all dressed in black and white, as it is a symbol of the homogeneity of this profession. Dressing alike means representing a common mission of justice for the citizens," he conceded while suggesting that the younger members at the Bar must be nurtured and made to understand this.
Justice Chandrachud highlighted the achievements of the judiciary, especially with respect to the disposal of cases. Still, admitting that the pendency of cases in courts was high, he felt a large number of cases were disposed also.
Lauding the feat of the judiciary, he said, "We find from the National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG) that 15.42 crore orders are available. We have given judgment in 11 crore cases and only 4 crore cases are pending."
Meanwhile, the High Courts have 56.02 lakh cases pending and 3.18 crore cases have been concluded.
The Supreme Court judge highlighted, "In Maharashtra, over 48 lakh cases are pending, the oldest case being from Angola Taluka where the accused is absconding since 1958. About 16,474 cases have been stayed by the High Court."
Hence, just as there is a cause to celebrate, there should also be introspection on the way forward, he guided.