- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Gujarat High Court seeks State government's on appointment of members to the RERA Appellate Tribunal
Gujarat High Court seeks State government's on appointment of members to the RERA Appellate Tribunal
State government's response has been sought by the Gujarat High Court in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking the appointment of Chairperson and technical members to the Gujarat Real Estate Appellate Tribunal.
A Bench of Chief Justice Aravind Kumar and Justice Ashutosh J Shastri passed the order in the plea which also challenged the the constitution of the Tribunal and sought creation of a website for the same.
As per the PIL filed by Advocate Nipun Singhvi, the post of Chairperson has been vacant since June 2021, and that of technical member has been vacant since September 2021.
"Due to non-appointment on the vacant post in the appellate Tribunal has jeopardized and curtailed the right to appeal of the litigants as no appeal could be preferred or adjudicated before the appellate Tribunal because of Coram Non Judice," the petition explains.
Further, it stated that not appointing a Chairperson, technical or administrative member with knowledge and expertise in the particular subject impaired the efficiency and effectiveness of adjudication.
"It is necessary that those who adjudicate upon these matters should have apart from legal expertise should also have technical knowledge of the subject, therefore, in the bench of the Real Estate Appellate Tribunal, the technical member or the administrative member along with Chairperson should be appointed."
Additionally, it was emphasised that every 'public authority' was required to have a website for accountability, transparency and administrative purposes, to enable access to the public.
"However, at present there is no independent website of the appellate tribunal which creates a hurdle in the access/administration of justice," reads the petition.
The petitioner also sought a direction for the operations of the Appellate Tribunal to be placed under the supervision of the Gujarat government's legal department, rather than the urban development and urban housing department.