- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Gujarat High Court Orders Authorities to Transfer Petitioner’s Documents to DG of GST Intelligence for Inquiry
Gujarat High Court Orders Authorities to Transfer Petitioner’s Documents to DG of GST Intelligence for Inquiry
He had stated that under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, an earlier inspection conducted at his premises was pending
The Gujarat High Court has directed the tax authorities to transfer all relevant documents of the petitioner to the Directorate General of Intelligence, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) for investigation.
In a writ petition, Vipulchandra Pursottamdas Mahant, the proprietor of Vaibhavi Construction stated that a prior inspection conducted by the DG under Section 67(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, at his premises was still pending.
Mahant contended that since the investigation was initiated by the DG, the tax authorities should not conduct a separate inquiry.
The division bench of Justice Vipul M. Pancholi and Justice Devan M. Desai noted that the DG of GST Intelligence had already initiated an inquiry, conducted document inspections, and carried out on-site investigations at the petitioner's location. Therefore, the petition merited proper consideration.
The judges ruled that the tax authorities must transfer all relevant documents to the DG for proper inquiry. They instructed the petitioner to co-operate and furnish the necessary documents needed for further investigation.