- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Delhi High Court provides relief to Ola, Uber and Rapido
Delhi High Court provides relief to Ola, Uber and Rapido
Directs the Transport Department against taking any coercive measures
In a major relief to Ola, Uber, and Rapido, the Delhi High Court has put a stay on the public notice and show-cause notice issued to halt the ride-sharing platforms.
A division bench of Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Neena Bansal Krishna has directed the Transport Department to refrain from taking any coercive measures against the app-based ride-sharing platforms until a comprehensive policy is formulated.
Early this year, the app-based aggregators were prevented from plying bike taxis on the road without commercial permits. The Transport Department had ordered an immediate halt to the bike taxi services provided by these platforms. It warned that any violation would result in penal action.
The public notice by the Transport Department stated that the companies defying the orders would be fined up to Rs.1 lakh, as the use of bikes for commercial purposes violated the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
Uber expressed its gratitude towards the court's order providing protection to the company against any forced behavior.
The statement of Uber, the transportation company, read, "We welcome the high court's order to give Uber protection from coercive action on bike taxis in Delhi. This will bring relief to drivers on our platform, whose livelihood had been impacted by the ban as also to the hundreds and thousands of riders who choose to ride on Moto for affordability and last-mile connectivity. We are committed to serving the city and being the platform of choice for riders and drivers alike.”