- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Delhi High Court Provides Relief To INOX India In Copyright Registration Appeal
Delhi High Court Provides Relief To INOX India In Copyright Registration Appeal
The Delhi High Court recently provided relief to INOX India (INOX) by allowing an appeal challenging specific remarks included in the copyright registration certificate issued by the Registrar of Copyrights.
The appeal addressed INOX's contention that the Registrar of Copyrights had incorrectly imposed remarks on the certificate, including a statement that copyright in the work would cease if applied to an article more than 50 times. INOX argued that this restriction was inapplicable, as the artistic work in question, consisting of technical drawings, does not qualify for registration as a "design" under the Designs Act, 2000. INOX asserted that these remarks were unfounded and had been added without proper reasoning or rationale.
During the proceedings before Justice Mini Pushkarna, the Registrar of Copyrights agreed to amend the registration certificate, committing to issue a corrected certificate without the contested remarks within four weeks. Additionally, the Registrar’s counsel informed the Court of ongoing updates to the website portal to prevent similar issues in the future.
The Court took note of these submissions and disposed of the appeal accordingly.
Khaitan & Co represented INOX in this matter. The team included Partner Smriti Yadav, Partner Nirupam Lodha, Principal Associate Dhiren Karania, Senior Associate Gautam Wadhwa, and Associate Vanshika Thapliyal.
Senior Advocate Chander M. Lall appeared for INOX in this matter.