Delhi High Court in Right to be Forgotten Case: Seeks Google’s Reply on De-Indexing of Publications
Delhi High Court in Right to be Forgotten Case: Seeks Google’s Reply on De-Indexing of Publications
The Delhi High Court while adjudicating in the matter of Dr. Ishwarprasad Gilada vs. Union of India & Ors., has sought Google’s response as to whether de-indexing of publications can be done so that the URLs do not show up on search engine’s results.
A single-judge bench of Justice Prathiba M. Singh was hearing doctor Ishwar Gilada's petition pertaining to his wrongful arrest in regard to an FIR against him in 1999.
During the hearing, Advocate Rohit Anil Rathi appearing for Gilada contended that although he was discharged in the FIR by the Sessions court, the news articles are still available in the public domain.
Rathi relied on the Sessions Court order of 4 August, 2009, and submitted, “I (Dr. Gilada) was discharged from the FIR, as there was no evidence of me engaging in any illegality”.
He also relied on the order in Jorawer Singh Mundy vs. Union of India and Others wherein Google was directed to remove a judgment from their search results.
Noting the submissions, the judge ordered, “Let an affidavit be filed by Google as to whether de-indexing of publications can be done so that URLs don’t appear in search engine’s results. Let the affidavit be filed within two weeks.”
Observing that prima facie all the publications had been served notice by the petitioner for impleadment, the Court issued notice to them, and directed the Centre and other respondents to file their reply to the plea.
Accordingly, the Court listed the matter for further hearing on May 18.
The petitioner, Dr. Ishwar Gilada is the first person to raise the alarm against AIDS in India (1985) and to start India’s first AIDS Clinic (1986) at the government-run JJ Hospital, Mumbai. He is a globally acclaimed HIV expert, credited with bringing India to the AIDS control map of the world. He is the President, of the AIDS Society of India (ASI) Secretary General, of Peoples Health Organization-India (PHO), and Governing Council member of the International AIDS Society.
The doctor was allegedly involved in illegally procuring medicines from abroad & administering the same to HIV patients in India. It was further alleged that he along with others mishandled HIV patients, on account of which one patient allegedly passed away.
The petitioner through Advocate Rohit Anil Rathi stated that the said articles are available both through the online platform of the publishers, namely British Medical Journal, the Lancet, NCBI, and Indian Paediatrics, and can also be searched on Google. His case is that he has already been discharged in the FIR that was registered against him in 1999.
Notably, Justice Singh on 17 February, 2023 had noted that Senior Advocate Arvind Nigam appearing for Google LLC would place on record other orders related to the case.
Accordingly, the single-judge had said, “in the meantime, considering that the publications, which are online, let an email communication be given by the Petitioner to the publications, which are online, along with the copy of this petition as an intimation to the said publishers about the filing of the present petition.”
“If they choose to join the proceedings on the next date of hearing, the following publications are allowed to do so; i. British Medical Journal, ii. The Lancet, iii. NCBI, and iv. Indian Paediatrics”, the Court had added.
