- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Delhi High Court guides whatsapp to remove illicit groups circulating Dainik Bhaskar owned e-newspapers
Delhi High Court guides whatsapp to remove illicit groups circulating Dainik Bhaskar owned e-newspapers According to the Delhi High Court, Whatsapp should remove or block groups of Unauthorized and illegally circulating the e-newspaper owned by Dainik Bhaskar Corp. Ltd. In his dissenting opinion, Justice Sanjeev Narula opined that Dainik Bhaskar Corp. Ltd., the plaintiff has made out a...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
Delhi High Court guides whatsapp to remove illicit groups circulating Dainik Bhaskar owned e-newspapers
According to the Delhi High Court, Whatsapp should remove or block groups of Unauthorized and illegally circulating the e-newspaper owned by Dainik Bhaskar Corp. Ltd.
In his dissenting opinion, Justice Sanjeev Narula opined that Dainik Bhaskar Corp. Ltd., the plaintiff has made out a prima facie case and claimed that it would suffer irreparable loss if an ex-parte order of injunction is not granted against those illegally circulating and disseminating its e-newspaper.
The Dainik Bhaskar Corp. Ltd. owns the trademarks "Dainik Bhaskar", "Divya Bhaskar," "Divya Marathi" and "Bhaskar Group"
The case was filed against WhatsApp LLC as the number one defendant and against people who had set up WhatsApp groups and were circulating e-newspapers illegally as defendants Nos. 3 to 88. Accordingly, a lawsuit was filed asking for an ex-parte injunction restraining the Defendants from infringing or enabling the infringement of the plaintiff's copyrights and trademarks.
Plaintiff claimed it began distributing e-newspapers through its websites "epaper.bhaskar.com" and "epaper.diyyabhaskar.com" on a subscription basis. In addition to the websites, Dainik Bhaskar also offers its e-newspapers and e-magazines through its mobile phone application.
Plaintiff was unaware of any other WhatsApp groups where e-newspapers were unauthorized and illegally shared and had therefore submitted that there might be many more.
Plaintiff argued that it owned the copyright in the e-newspaper, along with news articles and content on its websites and mobile application, and that these could not be unauthorized distributed.
In the meantime, Defendant No. 1 is ordered to disable/block the WhatsApp groups identified under paragraph 7 of the present application, which is unauthorized and illegally circulating the Plaintiff's e-newspaper," the Court ruled.
A roster bench hearing will now take place on May 2, 2022.
Title: DB CORP LTD v. WHATSAPP LLC & ORS.