- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Delhi High Court grants interim injunction against Ramdev Industries for use of logo similar to LAY's
Delhi High Court grants interim injunction against Ramdev Industries for use of logo similar to LAY's
Justice Navin Chawla also appointed a Local Commissioner and directed confiscation of all the products bearing the impugned logo.
The Delhi High Court passed an ad interim injunction against a namkeen manufacturer for using a logo which was deceptively similar to the "LAY's 'Sun Banner' device mark. The Court was dealing with a suit filed by Pepsico Inc. claiming that it was the registered proprietor of the 'Sun Banner' device, which was used in manufacturing LAY'S chips.
An infringement suit was filed against Ramdev Industries, situated in Rajasthan's Bikaner, for the use of the smiley logo under the trade name 'MADHAV'. While the plaintiff had no objection to the trade name being used, it was only aggrieved by the use of similar and deceptive logo.
A cease and desist notice was issued last year against the defendants, however they refused to comply with the requisition stating that the rival marks as well as the rival products were dissimilar.
The Court was of the prima facie opinion that the in comparison, the two logos appeared to be deceptively similar.
"These are goods that are bought off the shelf in normal grocery shop and therefore, there is a likelihood of confusion, especially keeping in view the unwary consumer. The balance of convenience is also in favour of the plaintiffs and against the defendants inasmuch as the plaintiffs have spent a huge amount in popularising its device mark," the Court said.
The Court also directed the Local Commissioner to carry samples of the infringing material found at the premises of the defendant for submission before Court as also photograph or videograph the proceedings and prepare an investigative report.