- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
CBIC directed to clarify distribution/reporting of the ISD credit by Bombay High Court
CBIC directed to clarify distribution/reporting of the ISD credit by Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court has directed the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) to issue clarification in relation to the distribution/reporting of the ISD credit.
The Bench comprising of Justices K.R. Shriram and Gauri Godse was dealing with a batch of writ petitions, highlighting the difficulties faced by the petitioners in the distribution/ reporting of the ISD credit.
The petitioners, including Unichem Laboratories Limited and Pfizer Limited, filed writ petitions before the Bombay High Court, raising the issue of procedural difficulties faced by them with respect to the distribution of the Input Service Distributor (ISD) credit of Service Tax/ Excise Duty under Section 140 of the CGST Act, 2017.
It was submitted by the Petitioners that they were not able to distribute the ISD credit or recognize and report the distribution of the ISD credit by the ISD to their respective units/offices, in view of the procedural and functional difficulties faced by them in relation to the GST forms and portal.
In response to this the revenue department averred that the ISD credit cannot be transitioned directly into the Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL) maintained under the GST Regime. The department submitted that, in view of the provisions of the CGST Act, the ISD credit has to be distributed by the said ISD to its different units/offices before 1.07.2017. The department added that in order to transition the said credit distributed to the transferee by the ISD, into its Electronic Credit Ledger, the transferee unit/offices are required to file TRAN-1.
Relying on Supreme Court's decision in Union of India & Anr. versus Filco Trade Centre Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. (2022), wherein the Apex Court had directed the GST Network to open the common portal to file or rectify TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 for a specified period, i.e., with effect from 1st September, 2022 to 31st October, 2022, in order to aid the assessees to overcome the procedural/technical hurdles faced by them and enable them to avail the Transitional Credit.
Holding that they intended to adopt the same approach, the Bench allowed the petitioners to avail the said window and file the GST TRAN-1 or revised GST TRAN-1 at the units/offices between 1st September, 2022 to 31st October, 2022, in terms of the order passed by the Supreme Court in Filco Trade Centre (2022).
Further, the Court directed the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) to issue a clarification in relation to the distribution/ reporting of the ISD credit within 21 days.
"The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), keeping in mind the problems faced by various parties, to issue a clarification, after due deliberation, in relation to the distribution / reporting of ISD credit preferably within 21 days from the date this is Order is uploaded, keeping in mind the approach adopted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Filco Trade (Supra). Petitioners, may, if so advised, approach the CBIC in this regard.", the Court said.