- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Calcutta High Court holds non-speaking order invalid under the WBGST Act
Calcutta High Court holds non-speaking order invalid under the WBGST Act
Views that the notice was not served properly and violated the principles of natural justice
In a significant ruling, the Calcutta High Court (HC) has set aside the Goods and Services Tax (GST) order under the West Bengal Goods and Service Tax (WBGST) Act and held that the non-speaking order was not valid.
The petitioner, Maxxcab Wires & Cables Pvt. Ltd. & Anr, had challenged the October 2022 notice and the subsequent November order on the ground that it was a non-speaking order.
The petitioner apprised that while the impugned notice was issued on 27 October, he was asked to appear before the Adjudicating Authority (AA) on 3 October, the date which had expired. He requested that the vehicle and the goods be released, as his vehicle broke down and the period to appear before the concerned authorities was less than 24 hours.
The court viewed that the notice had not been served properly. Clearly, there was a violation of the principles of natural justice.
Thus, Justice Nizamuddin set aside the impugned 4 November order and remanded the matter back to the AA. It ordered the AA to pass a fresh speaking order after giving an opportunity for a hearing as well as allowing the petitioner to make fresh representation against the 27 October show-cause notice.
While disposing of the petition, the court held, "The respondents shall consider the prayer for the release of the goods and the vehicle of the petitioner in accordance with the law."