- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Calcutta High Court cancels IT department's reassessment notices
Calcutta High Court cancels IT department's reassessment notices It was done on grounds of failure to follow statutory formalities The Calcutta High Court has quashed the reassessment notices for failure on the part of the Income Tax department to follow statutory formalities. About 43 petitions were filed assailing the issuance of the impugned notices under the Income Tax (IT)...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
Calcutta High Court cancels IT department's reassessment notices
It was done on grounds of failure to follow statutory formalities
The Calcutta High Court has quashed the reassessment notices for failure on the part of the Income Tax department to follow statutory formalities.
About 43 petitions were filed assailing the issuance of the impugned notices under the Income Tax (IT) Act, 1961. The petitions mentioned that the same was barred by limitations. The Income Tax authority had not observed the statutory formalities as prescribed by the Finance Act, 2021 before issuing the notices. The Finance Act was applicable with effect from 1 April 2021.
The single bench of Justice Md. Nizamuddin held that the explanation to the notifications dated 31 March 2021 and 27 April 2021 were ultra vires under the Relaxation Act, 2020, and hence null and void.
All the impugned notices under the IT Act were quashed with a liberty to the assessing officers to initiate fresh reassessment proceedings in accordance with the relevant provisions of the amended Finance Act.