Bombay High Court to Determine Whether Appeal Against Order Under NIA Act Can Be Heard After 90-Day Limit
Bombay High Court to Determine Whether Appeal Against Order Under NIA Act Can Be Heard After 90-Day Limit
The Bombay High Court is set to determine the contemporary issue i.e., whether an appeal filed under Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Act should be entertained or not if it is filed after the statutory limitation period of 90 days from the passing of the Trial Court order.
A division bench of Justices Revati Mohite Dere and Gauri Godse termed it as an ‘important issue’ and appointed two senior advocates — Aabad Ponda and Sharan Jagtiani — to assist the Court on the issue.
The issue was raised when the Court was hearing appeals filed by two accused arrested by the NIA in two different cases.
The first appeal was filed by dismissed cop Vinayak Shinde, an accused in the Antilia bomb scare case and death of businessman Mansukh Hiran in 2021. The appeal was filed after a delay of 299 days.
Shinde sought bail on grounds of parity with co-accused Naresh Gaur, who availed of bail from the special NIA court and the same was upheld by the High Court. After the rejection of his plea by the special NIA court, Shinde approached the High Court with an appeal.
The second appeal was filed with a delay of 835 days by one Faizal Mirza, who was arrested by the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) for conspiring with Pakistan-based terror organisations to carry out attacks in Mumbai, Gujarat and Uttar Pradesh.
Mirza’s case was transferred to the NIA in 2018. As per the central anti-terror agency, Mirza approached the High Court with an appeal after a delay of 835 days from the date of rejection of his bail plea by the special NIA Court.
The central agency argued that as per Section 21 of the NIA Act, an appeal filed with a delay of more than 90 days could not be entertained by the Court and therefore the appeal be dismissed.
Section 21(5) provides every appeal under the provision shall be preferred within a period of thirty days; High Court may entertain an appeal after the expiry of the said period but no appeal shall be entertained after the expiry of period of ninety days.
In order to settle the question of condonation of delay, the Court will hear the advocates after two weeks.
Jagtiani has been appointed an amicus in Shinde’s appeal, while Ponda will be assisting the Court in Mirza’s appeal.
