- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Bombay High Court Stays Show Cause-Cum- Service Tax Demand Notice Issued to CA
Bombay High Court Stays Show Cause-Cum- Service Tax Demand Notice Issued to CA The Bombay High Court (HC) division bench of Justices Milind N. Jadhav and Ujjal Bhuyan, in the case of Amrish Rameshchandra Shah (Petitioner) v. Union of India & Ors. (Respondent) directed the respondent to file the reply, stayed the show cause-cum-demand notice Mr. Amrish Rameshchandra Shah...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
Bombay High Court Stays Show Cause-Cum- Service Tax Demand Notice Issued to CA
The Bombay High Court (HC) division bench of Justices Milind N. Jadhav and Ujjal Bhuyan, in the case of Amrish Rameshchandra Shah (Petitioner) v. Union of India & Ors. (Respondent) directed the respondent to file the reply, stayed the show cause-cum-demand notice
Mr. Amrish Rameshchandra Shah (petitioner/ assessee) is a Chartered Accountant (CA) and a partner in a firm. The Assessee was served with a show cause-cum-demand notice dated 30 December 2020, based on the Income Tax Return (ITR) filed by the firm for the relevant year.
Based on the declaration made in the ITR, a view has been taken by the respondent that the remuneration received by the assessee from the firm is subject to service tax and since this has not been paid, impugned show cause-cum-demand notice has been issued.
On behalf of the assessee, it was submitted that the impugned show cause-cum-demand notice has been issued without jurisdiction. The firm had filed an ITR and has paid service tax and there was no default on his part.
The assessee relied on a decision of the Central Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), given in the case of Alpa Management Consultants P. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Service Tax, 2007(6) S.T.R. 181, wherein it held that service tax cannot be recovered based on the returns shown in the ITR. The appeal filed by the service tax department before the Karnataka High Court (HC) was dismissed on the ground of maintainability where after service tax department approached the SC. The SC dismissed the civil appeal filed by the Commissioner of Service Tax.
Issue
Whether show cause-cum-demand notice for recovery of service tax can be issued based on ITR?
The HC stated, "There shall be stay of the impugned show cause-cum-demand notice dated 30.12.2020."
The matter is listed on 15 March 2021, for the next date of hearing.