- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Kirkland & Ellis and McGuire Woods Advise Boeing in federal Fraud case
Kirkland & Ellis and McGuire Woods Advise Boeing in federal Fraud case According to the US Department of Justice, aviation major Boeing has agreed to pay just over $2.5 billion to resolve a federal charge of "criminal misconduct" for how its employees misled regulatory officials during certification of the 737 MAX. Boeing has agreed to pay the amount as part of a deferred...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
Kirkland & Ellis and McGuire Woods Advise Boeing in federal Fraud case
According to the US Department of Justice, aviation major Boeing has agreed to pay just over $2.5 billion to resolve a federal charge of "criminal misconduct" for how its employees misled regulatory officials during certification of the 737 MAX. Boeing has agreed to pay the amount as part of a deferred prosecution agreement.
Of that amount, only $243.6 million, less than 10 per cent, is a fine paid to the US government for the criminal conduct, "which reflects a fine at the low end" of the sentencing guidelines, the court agreement said.
The rest includes an additional $500 million which the company has committed to pay as compensation to the families of the 346 people who died in two crashes of the 737 MAX.
Boeing has agreed that it mislead US regulators who certified Max's design. The prosecution agreement stipulates that the charge will be dropped after three years if Boeing complies with a series of requirements.
The aviation giant was advised by Kirkland & Ellis and McGuire Woods in the federal fraud case.