- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Till recently, branded a polluting country, India is now emerging as a destination for sustainable development through sustainable energy...This article discusses sustainable development through sustainable energy. This topic is of high relevance especially for India when for quite some time our metropolitan cities have been classified as among the most polluted if not the most polluted cities...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
Till recently, branded a polluting country, India is now emerging as a destination for sustainable development through sustainable energy...
This article discusses sustainable development through sustainable energy. This topic is of high relevance especially for India when for quite some time our metropolitan cities have been classified as among the most polluted if not the most polluted cities in the world. We are not alone in this matter. We are in a good company of the US and China, with the US being the most polluted industrialized country in the world. Therefore, international action and discussion on this issue are indispensable at this stage.
Global Perspective
Internationally, the signing of the climate change agreement in Paris in 2015 was an important step to draw attention to this matter and to act to reduce global warming by 2% in the next decade. The US was a party to it, but unfortunately, the new President who was opposed to this agreement even during his election campaign has finally withdrawn from the agreement. This Paris Agreement calls for sustainable development to ensure access to affordable, reliable and sustainable, and modern energy for all as one of the 17 goals for 2030. It aims at universal access to electricity and clean cooking fuels doubling the rate of improvement of energy efficiency and doubling the share of renewable energy through public and private finance.
India, though branded as a polluting country, played a major role in the Paris Agreement. In the last 3 years, India has taken the lead towards sustainable energy in the areas of wind power, hydropower, biomass, and biofuel. It was instrumental in creating International Solar Alliance (ISA), which is an alliance of 121 solar-resourced rich countries. ISA was jointly launched by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and then French President Hollande on 13th November 2015 in Paris.
In conformity with the ISA Framework Agreement which was signed on 15th November 2016 in Morocco, it became a treaty on 6th December 2017, with its headquarters in India. The main objectives of the ISA are to use solar energy massively and to innovate to reduce its generation cost as also to mobilize USD 1 trillion of investments by 2030. India has committed '175 crores for setting up of ISA and till date, released '145 crores.
During the inauguration of the first assembly in October this year, the PM stated that India's target is to generate 40% of her total energy requirements in 2030 by non-fossil fuelbased sources. He also said that efforts have been made to make India's transport system clean fuel based. There is a plan to launch National Energy Storage
Mission that will look at technology development and policy framework. This initiative has received the support of the United Nations in the presence of its Secretary General.
In the first assembly of the ISA, the member States have agreed to pursue an increased share of solar energy in the final energy consumption in respective national energy mix. Till date, 70 countries have signed the framework agreement and it is hoped that the use of solar energy will get a boost. However, despite the best of intentions, trillion dollars of investments in sustainable energy can be affected by many factors including market size, country risk, and financial markets. The most important factors remain the policies and regulations of individual countries and attitude of the government in creating sustainable policies. Sometime back under the auspices of the World Bank, a group called RISE launched a survey in the area of sustainable energy. In its 200-page report, it has brought out the status of progress in sustainable energy by studying the situation of 111 countries. The group's findings are pretty interesting, some of which are highlighted below:
a) Almost 80% of the 111 countries have begun to
implement elements of supportive policy frameworks. In the policy formulation segment, around 45 countries are
already at a reasonably advanced stage. Unsurprisingly, high-income OECD countries have stronger policy and
regulatory frameworks.
b) About half of the 45 countries with strong policies are emerging economies. They are South Africa (Africa), China, India, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam (Asia), Brazil, Chile, Columbia and Mexico (Latin America), and Algeria, Egypt, and Iran (Middle East). Central Asian countries like Armenia, Ukraine, etc. also have effective policies.
c) Of the world's largest energy consumers, 7 offer strong policy frameworks. However, it is sad that there are many countries, especially in Africa, where either policy is non-existent or there is no access to energy.
d) In sub-Saharan Africa, about 600 million people in Ethiopia, Nigeria, and Sudan have very limited access to energy, let alone clean energy. The population of these countries has access rates below 20%.
Indian Perspective
India is emerging
as a destination
for sustainable
development
through sustainable
energy
India has time and again
reiterated its commitment
towards clean energy and
reducing carbon emissions.
India's increased thrust
on renewable energy was
reflected in the 2015 national
budget, which set a fivefold
increase in renewable
energy targets to achieve
175 GW by 2022 comprising
100 GW solar, 60 GW wind, 10 GW biomass, and 5 GW
small hydropower capacity. The conventional coal-fired
thermal plan, which is around 70% of the total capacity,
dominates the existing power generation. If we see the
world scenario, though in many countries sustainable
energy policy is available, they are not backed
by an effective regulatory framework. Even in
countries where regulatory framework is available,
very few countries have made serious progress in
investment in energy-efficient appliances or investment in
grid corrections.
In my opinion, India faces three major challenges affecting
the growth of sustainable energy:
1. India has a quasi-federal Constitutional structure where
legislative and executive powers are delineated between
the Centre and the states. The Seventh Schedule of
the Constitution designates subjects over which the legislative power is assigned to the Centre (List I),
states (List II), and concurrently to both (List III).
Electricity is a concurrent subject under Entry 38 in List
III; therefore, both Centre and states can legislate on
this matter. Matters relating to inter-state transactions
are in the Centre's domain, while states are responsible
for the inter-state sale, purchase, distribution, and
supply of electricity. However, in practice, the
demarcation of power between the state and Centre
is not as simplistic. Concurrent jurisdiction prevents
the Centre from directing the states to take specific
action. This can be observed in the manner that the
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) and
the State Electricity Regulatory Commissions (SERCs)
function.
Therefore, while the Central Government's thrust on
development of renewable energy is apparent, the
Constitutional framework prevents the Centre from
realizing its vision without the support of the states.
While the Centre can facilitate and incentivize the states
to achieve renewable energy targets, it cannot overstep
the bounds of concurrent jurisdiction to implement or
penalize non-compliance by the states. States have
often used this Constitutional authority to push back on
reforms spearheaded by the Centre which do not further
their political agenda.
2. State distribution companies (Discoms) are by far the
largest purchasers of electricity, including that from
renewable energy sources. Therefore, the ability of the
Discoms to purchase such power lies at the heart of
the success of the national-level directional shift from
conventional to renewable power. However, presently,
Discoms are reeling under massive debts and their
actions are often dictated by local political factors rather
than the achievement of operational and technical
efficiency. Working towards the ambitious national
renewable energy targets necessarily requires a revamp
of the electricity distribution sector. Major legislative
amendments and policy changes have been made and
are underway at the central level to create an enabling
environment for the nationwide growth of renewable
energy.
3. The enactment of the Electricity Act marked a paradigm
shift within the power sector towards a globally
competitive model, with an emphasis on renewable
power. Section 86(i)e of the Electricity Act specifically
included promotion and cogeneration of electricity from
renewable sources of energy and setting of RPO targets
among the functions of SERCs. The Electricity Act also
empowered the SERCs to specify the terms and conditions
for the determination of tariffs, and in doing so, they
should be guided by 'the promotion of cogeneration
and generation of electricity from renewable sources
of energy'. The Electricity Act aimed to make power
distribution more transparent and accountable by
unbundling the state electricity boards, resulting in
the formation of independent companies with separate
financial accounts for the generation, transmission, and
distribution of power, set up of independent regulatory
commissions at the state and Central levels and the
Appellate Tribunal (APTEL). However, problems in the
sector persist with the corporatized entities continuing
to function as public enterprises. This throws some
light on why even 13 years after the enactment of the
Electricity Act, Discoms are reeling under a cumulative
debt of '4.3 trillion. Reasons attributable to this debt
include commercially unviable tariffs, losses from theft
coupled with transmission and billing inefficiencies.
The adverse financial condition of the Discoms affects
their creditworthiness and therefore further prevents
them from raising debt for the renewable energy sector;
the financial condition of Discoms is particularly
relevant since Discoms are the biggest off-takers of
renewable power.
In conclusion, I believe that India is emerging as a
destination for sustainable development through
sustainable energy. Actions and policy measures taken
by India raise hopes for a better living environment. This
is remarkable considering that until recently, India was
classified as a polluting country. In Hinduja Group, we have
started investing in solar energy. Today, we are operating
a portfolio of 125 MW and have also recently acquired 2
solar companies and are in discussions with several others
to expand our solar portfolio. Therefore, it seems that India
through its initiatives is leading by example and is making
a mark in the world.
Disclaimer – The above are the personal views of the author
Abhijit Mukhopadhyay is the President (Legal) and General Counsel of the Hinduja Group and is involved in the Group’s worldwide legal matters based in the Group’s Headquarters in London. He is a Board Director in Group companies in seven countries. Previously, he worked in India as Company Secretary and General Counsel in several major companies. Abhijit graduated in Commerce (Honours), Law from the UK and India and Company and Chartered Secretaryship from India and the UK. Abhijit has been listed in the top 50 legal professionals, top 25 GCs, Legal 500 most powerful lists and also in the list of top 99 General Counsels from 31 countries. The Hinduja Group employs 150,000 people in 60 countries with a global annual turnover of USD 15 billion. Abhijit was the Vice Chairman of the ICC’s Arbitration Commission and a member of its Steering Committee in Paris. He is on the Advisory Council of CCLS, Queen Mary University of London, an Executive Committee Member of the IBF, Confederation of Indian Industry, UK and Liaison Officer of the International Bar Association’s global Corporate Counsel Forum. He has spoken globally and published articles in many countries.