- Home
- News
- Articles+
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
- News
- Articles
- Aerospace
- Agriculture
- Alternate Dispute Resolution
- Banking and Finance
- Bankruptcy
- Book Review
- Bribery & Corruption
- Commercial Litigation
- Competition Law
- Conference Reports
- Consumer Products
- Contract
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Covid-19
- Cryptocurrency
- Cybersecurity
- Data Protection
- Defence
- Digital Economy
- E-commerce
- Employment Law
- Energy and Natural Resources
- Entertainment and Sports Law
- Environmental Law
- FDI
- Food and Beverage
- Health Care
- IBC Diaries
- Insurance Law
- Intellectual Property
- International Law
- Know the Law
- Labour Laws
- Litigation
- Litigation Funding
- Manufacturing
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- NFTs
- Privacy
- Private Equity
- Project Finance
- Real Estate
- Risk and Compliance
- Technology Media and Telecom
- Tributes
- Zoom In
- Take On Board
- In Focus
- Law & Policy and Regulation
- IP & Tech Era
- Viewpoint
- Arbitration & Mediation
- Tax
- Student Corner
- AI
- ESG
- Gaming
- Inclusion & Diversity
- Law Firms
- In-House
- Rankings
- E-Magazine
- Legal Era TV
- Events
Kotak Committee's Recommendations On Corporate Governance
SEBI, by accepting most of the Kotak Committeerecommendations, has displayed its willingness toundertake strong and bold measures to improve thecorporate governance environment in India and align itwith global best practices...The Securities and Exchange Board of India("SEBI"), in furtherance of its role of a regulatorand in light of developments in corporategovernance globally, constituted...
ToRead the Full Story, Subscribe to
Access the exclusive LEGAL ERAStories,Editorial and Expert Opinion
SEBI, by accepting most of the Kotak Committee
recommendations, has displayed its willingness to
undertake strong and bold measures to improve the
corporate governance environment in India and align it
with global best practices...
The Securities and Exchange Board of India
("SEBI"), in furtherance of its role of a regulator
and in light of developments in corporate
governance globally, constituted a committee
under the chairmanship of Uday Kotak
(hereinafter, the "Kotak Committee") in June 2017. On
October 5, 2017, post deliberation with various stakeholders,
the Kotak Committee submitted its report ("Report")
proposing amendments to the SEBI (Listing Obligation and
Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (LODR) with
the objective of enhancing fairness and transparency in the
corporate governance landscape in India.
SEBI, in its board meeting on March 28, 2018, considered
the Report and accepted several reforms suggested by the
Kotak Committee both with (15) and without modifications
(40). Certain recommendations, which were criticized by
market participants as being an example of 'jurisdictional
over-reach', have been referred to various agencies (i.e.,
government, other regulators, professional bodies, etc.),
considering that the matters involved related to them.
The following are some of the key recommendations of the
Kotak Committee approved by SEBI:
A. Increasing Transparency
issues and glitches, such
as the fact that various
recommendations of the
Kotak Committee which
have been approved have
been made applicable to
top companies in terms of
market capitalization
Corporate governance norms are aimed at monitoring
and ensuring effective and cost-viable functioning
of a corporation. Therefore, effective disclosures are
fundamental to corporate governance. Some of the
measures suggested by the Kotak Committee and
approved by SEBI in this regard are as below:
i. Disclosure of utilization of funds from Qualified
Institutional Placement (QIP)/Preferential Issues in
the Annual Report of the listed company until such
funds are completely utilized.
ii. Disclosures of Auditor credentials, audit fee,
reasons for resignation of auditors to be recorded in
the Annual Report. Further, the notice being sent to
shareholders for an Annual General Meeting (AGM)
where the statutory auditor(s) is/are proposed to
be appointed/re-appointed will have to include
disclosures as a part of the explanatory statement
to the notice, including proposed fees, basis of
recommendation for appointment, credentials, etc.
iii. Details of expertise/skills of directors to be published
in the Annual Report.
iv. Enhanced disclosure of related party transactions
(RPT) to be submitted to the stock exchanges and
published on their website. Further, listed entities
will now have to include disclosures of transactions
of the listed entity with any person or entity
belonging to the promoter/promoter group which
hold(s) 10 percent or more shareholding in the
listed entity, in the format prescribed in the relevant
accounting standards for annual results in their
Annual Report.
v. Mandatory disclosure of consolidated quarterly
results with effect from Financial Year 2019-2020.
vi. All listed companies and their material subsidiaries
incorporated in India will have to undertake
secretarial audit and annex a secretarial audit report
given by a practicing company secretary with their
Annual Reports.
B. Reshaping the Management of the
Company
The board of directors of a company, being entrusted
to keep a check on the management, is its primary
governance body and it owes a fiduciary duty to a
company as a whole and to various stakeholders. The
following measures have been recommended by the
Kotak Committee to strengthen the institution of the
board of directors:
i. The top 500 listed entities (by market capitalization)
having a public shareholding of 40 percent or
more have to separate the office of CEO/MD and
Chairperson with effect from April 1, 2020.
ii. The top 1000 listed entities (by market capitalization)
and the top 2000 listed entities should mandatorily
have a minimum of six directors and a minimum of
one woman director on their boards by April 1, 2019
and April 1, 2020, respectively.
iii. No person will be allowed to hold the office of
director in more than eight listed entities at the
same time (of which independent directorships are
capped at seven) with effect from April 1, 2019.
Further, with effect from April 1, 2020, such number
will be capped at seven.
iv. No person who is a part of the promoter group can
be appointed as an Independent Director. Further, to
avoid the problem of 'board interlocks', a person who
is a non-independent director of another company
on the board of which any non-independent director
of the listed entity is an independent director will
not be eligible to be an independent director in the
listed entity.
C. Enhanced Role of Committees
i. Audit Committee - The Audit Committee will have
to review the utilization of loans and/or advances
from/investment by the holding company in the
subsidiary exceeding '100 crore or 10 percent of the
asset size of the subsidiary, whichever is lower.
ii. Nomination and Remuneration Committee – The
Nomination and Remuneration Committee, which
is currently mandated by the LODR Regulations to
recommend to the board of directors the appointment
and removal of the senior management of a listed
entity, shall now have to identify and recommend to
the board the appointment and removal of persons
for the positions/offices one level below the Chief
Executive Officer/Managing Director/Whole Time
Director/Manager (including Chief Executive Officer/
Manager, in case Chief Executive Officer/Manager is
not a part of the board), specifically including the
position of the company secretary and the chief
financial officer: Such positions/offices will now be
considered to be a part of the 'senior management'.
Further, it shall now be the duty of the Nomination
and Remuneration Committee specifically to
recommend to the board all remuneration, in
whatever form, payable to members of the senior
management.
iii. Risk Management Committee - The functions of the
Risk Management Committee shall now specifically
cover cybersecurity.
D. Board and Shareholder Meetings
i. Quorum of the board of directors will be one-third of
the total strength of the board of directors or three
directors, whichever is higher.
ii. Top 100 entities to hold AGMs within 5 months after
the end of FY 2018-19, i.e., by August 31, 2019.
iii. Webcast of AGMs will be compulsory for top 100
entities by market capitalization w.e.f. FY 2018-19.
iv. Shareholder approval (majority of minority) for
royalty/brand payments to related party exceeding
2 percent of consolidated turnover (instead of the
proposed 5 percent).
Comment:
SEBI, by accepting most of the Kotak Committee's
recommendations, has displayed its willingness to
undertake strong and bold measures to improve the corporate
governance environment in India and align it with global
best practices. Most of the approved recommendations are
firmly rooted in local business realities peculiar to India,
where most listed entities are promoter-led as opposed to
being professionally managed, thus increasing risks of
promoter-raj at the cost of minority shareholders.
To conclude, while there may exist certain issues and
glitches, such as the fact that various recommendations
of the Kotak Committee which have been approved have
been made applicable to top companies in terms of market
capitalization, precluding smaller listed entities from such
compliance requirements even though it is usually some
of the smaller listed entities wherein corporate governance
standards are found to be wanting, the approved
recommendations are indeed welcome.
Disclaimer – The views expressed in this article are the personal views of the author and are purely informative in nature.