Madras HC tells teacher who Challenged Biometric Attendance System to get Aadhaar else Leave the Job

By :  Legal Era
Update: 2019-04-17 03:49 GMT
story

The Madras High Court, while rejecting a plea of a teacher challenging the introduction of Aadhaar Enabled Biometric Attendance System in government schools, ruled, “The Writ Petitioner cannot say that she cannot be compelled to get an Aadhaar Number for the purpose of attending the School.”The HC asked R Annal, a teacher in a government high school, to either enrol herself to Aadhaar...

The Madras High Court, while rejecting a plea of a teacher challenging the introduction of Aadhaar Enabled Biometric Attendance System in government schools, ruled, “The Writ Petitioner cannot say that she cannot be compelled to get an Aadhaar Number for the purpose of attending the School.”

The HC asked R Annal, a teacher in a government high school, to either enrol herself to Aadhaar or leave the service.

Annal had challenged the implementation of the Aadhar Enabled Biometric Attendance System for Teaching and Non-Teaching Staff in Government and Government Aided High Schools or Higher Secondary Schools across Tamil Nadu.

She had not enrolled herself under Aadhaar as the same was not mandatory, she said.

The mandatory implementation of the Aadhar Enabled Biometric Attendance System directly contravenes the Constitution bench judgment in the Aadhaar case, she claimed.

Collecting individual particulars and identification as far as Government servants were concerned, could not be construed as violation of the Fundamental Rights ensured under the Constitution of India, Justice SM Subramaniam observed.

The constitution bench judgment would not be applicable in this case, as the petitioner, a public servant, was governed by the Tamil Nadu Government Servants Service Rules, the court also said.

While accepting the offer of appointment, public servants made a declaration that they will abide by the Service Rules and other conditions imposed by the Government of Tamil Nadu for the betterment of the Administration, the court added.

By - Legal Era

Similar News